The present invention relates to a method of measuring the speed of air in a zone of the atmosphere.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In meteorology, it is known to measure the speed of air by means of a radar using the Doppler effect: the radar transmits trains of sinusoidal waves or pulses that are returned to the radar by particles in suspension in the air; if the air is moving in such a manner as to cause the particles to move away from or towards the radar, then the pulses returned to the radar present a phase shift relative to the pulses it transmitted, which shift can be used for calculating the radial speed of the particles relative to the radar, and thus the speed of the air carrying the particles. Speed can thus be determined without ambiguity providing the real speed of the particles lies within a so-called Nyquist range that depends on the pulse repetition rate (also known as repetition frequency). If the real speed of the particles lies outside that range, then the speed that is calculated is equal to the real speed modulo the width of the Nyquist range. The calculated speed is then said to be folded into the Nyquist range.

To increase the width of this range, it is known to increase the repetition rate of the pulses. Nevertheless, that leads to a certain number of drawbacks, and in particular to strongly stressing the transmitter, to the transmitter consuming a large amount of energy, and to a reduction in the range of the radar.It is also possible to use a radar of longer wavelength. Nevertheless, such a radar is expensive.

It is also known to transmit bursts of pulses at first and second pulse repetition rates, with one rate taking the place of the other after each burst (the so-called dual pulse repetition frequency (PRF) method). By combining the speeds calculated from the pulses received in return from the pulses transmitted during successive bursts, the speed of the particles can be determined without ambiguity in a larger Nyquist range. Nevertheless, since the radar antenna is revolving continuously, the zone of the atmosphere to which a burst is transmitted at the first repetition rate is slightly different from the zone to which the following burst is transmitted at the second repetition rate. This results in inaccuracy in determining speed, and this inaccuracy increases when the radar is located in a zone where air speeds present high levels of local variation and where the radar rotates at a high speed.

In meteorology, it is known to measure the speed of air by means of a radar using the Doppler effect: the radar transmits trains of sinusoidal waves or pulses that are returned to the radar by particles in suspension in the air; if the air is moving in such a manner as to cause the particles to move away from or towards the radar, then the pulses returned to the radar present a phase shift relative to the pulses it transmitted, which shift can be used for calculating the radial speed of the particles relative to the radar, and thus the speed of the air carrying the particles. Speed can thus be determined without ambiguity providing the real speed of the particles lies within a so-called Nyquist range that depends on the pulse repetition rate (also known as repetition frequency). If the real speed of the particles lies outside that range, then the speed that is calculated is equal to the real speed modulo the width of the Nyquist range. The calculated speed is then said to be folded into the Nyquist range.

To increase the width of this range, it is known to increase the repetition rate of the pulses. Nevertheless, that leads to a certain number of drawbacks, and in particular to strongly stressing the transmitter, to the transmitter consuming a large amount of energy, and to a reduction in the range of the radar.It is also possible to use a radar of longer wavelength. Nevertheless, such a radar is expensive.

It is also known to transmit bursts of pulses at first and second pulse repetition rates, with one rate taking the place of the other after each burst (the so-called dual pulse repetition frequency (PRF) method). By combining the speeds calculated from the pulses received in return from the pulses transmitted during successive bursts, the speed of the particles can be determined without ambiguity in a larger Nyquist range. Nevertheless, since the radar antenna is revolving continuously, the zone of the atmosphere to which a burst is transmitted at the first repetition rate is slightly different from the zone to which the following burst is transmitted at the second repetition rate. This results in inaccuracy in determining speed, and this inaccuracy increases when the radar is located in a zone where air speeds present high levels of local variation and where the radar rotates at a high speed.

OBJECT OF THE INVENTION

It would therefore be advantageous to have means enabling the speed of the air to be determined accurately within a Nyquist range that is relatively large.

It would therefore be advantageous to have means enabling the speed of the air to be determined accurately within a Nyquist range that is relatively large.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

For this purpose, the invention provides a method of measuring the speed of air in a zone of the atmosphere by the Doppler effect using a radar, the method comprising the steps of: transmitting bursts of three pulses at different rates F1, F2, F3; determining respective speeds V1, V2, V3 of the air from the pulses received in return from the pulses in each burst; and calculating the speed V of the air from the speeds V1, V2, V3 determined for the returned pulses received for each burst. Thus, each pulse is transmitted at a rate that is different from that of the following pulses. The Nyquist interval is then obtained by combining the three repetition rates so that the Nyquist interval is relatively large. The pulses at the three repetition rates are transmitted in succession towards a common zone of the atmosphere, thereby limiting the inaccuracy of the method.Preferably, calculating the speed V of the air comprises the stages of: calculating the Nyquist speeds Vn1, Vn2, Vn3 corresponding to each rate F1, F2, F3 and calculating the equivalent Nyquist speed Vneq; for each value of an integer k varying over the range [−Vneq/2Vn1+½; Vneq/2Vn1+½)]: calculating a speed Vtest=V1+2 kVn1; folding the speed Vtest into the ranges [−Vn2, Vn2] and [−Vn3, Vn3] to obtain the speeds V2′ and V3′; and calculating the differences ΔV2=V2′−V2 and ΔV3=V3′−V3 and the root-mean-square deviation E=√((ΔV22+ΔV32)/2); and retaining as the speed V, the speed Vtest corresponding to the smallest root-mean-square deviation. This mode of calculation is found to be relatively reliable and simple to implement by computer while using computer resources that are relatively small.Advantageously, the rates F1, F2, F3 are relatively close.This leads to the radar transmitter being stressed relatively little and therefore limits wear thereof.In a particular implementation, the method includes a step of determining said rates F1, F2, F3 by performing the following stages: determining pairs p/q and r/s such that p and q and also r and s are mutually prime, q and s are greater than p and r, respectively, p is greater than q/2, and r is greater than s/2; selecting a rate F1 and calculating a corresponding Nyquist speed Vn1; selecting a speed V′ corresponding to the maximum speed of air in the measurement zone and folding the speed V′ into the range [−Vn1, Vn1] to obtain the speed V1′; for each pair p/q and r/s: calculating rates F2=F1×p/q and F3=F1×r/s and calculating the Nyquist speeds Vn2 and Vn3; calculating the equivalent Nyquist speed Vneq=1 cm(p,r)×Vn1; for each value of an integer k varying over the range [−Vneq/2Vn1+½; Vneq/2Vn1+½] calculating a speed Vtest=V1′+2 kVn1; folding the speed Vtest into the ranges [−Vn2, Vn2] and [−Vn3, Vn3] to obtain the speeds V2′ and V3′; calculating the differences ΔV2=V2′−V2 and ΔV3=V3−V3 and calculating the root-mean-square deviation E=√((ΔV22+ΔV32)/2); and retaining the speed Vtest that corresponds to the smallest root-mean-square deviation; and comparing the speeds Vtest obtained for all of the pairs with the speed V′ to select the best pair. This determination technique is relatively simple, reliable, and fast.The comparison then advantageously comprises the stages of calculating, for all of the pairs, the difference Δ′=Vtest−V′ and verifying whether A′ is less than half the Nyquist speed Vn1.This comparison technique combines simplicity and effectiveness.Also preferably, the method includes the stage of allocating noise to the speeds V1′, V2′, and V3′ prior to using them in the calculations, the noise corresponding to the noise specific to the radar and to the atmospheric conditions that are usual in the measurement zone, and the step of folding the speeds V1′, V2′, and V3′ made noisy in this way into the ranges [−Vn1, Vn1], [−Vn2, Vn2], and [−Vn3, Vn3] to obtain the speeds V1′, V2′, and V3′ used subsequently in the calculations.It is thus possible to determine repetition rates that are optimized for the zone of the atmosphere in which speed measurements are performed.Other characteristics and advantages of the invention appear on reading the following description of a particular, non-limiting implementation of the invention.

For this purpose, the invention provides a method of measuring the speed of air in a zone of the atmosphere by the Doppler effect using a radar, the method comprising the steps of: transmitting bursts of three pulses at different rates F1, F2, F3; determining respective speeds V1, V2, V3 of the air from the pulses received in return from the pulses in each burst; and calculating the speed V of the air from the speeds V1, V2, V3 determined for the returned pulses received for each burst. Thus, each pulse is transmitted at a rate that is different from that of the following pulses. The Nyquist interval is then obtained by combining the three repetition rates so that the Nyquist interval is relatively large. The pulses at the three repetition rates are transmitted in succession towards a common zone of the atmosphere, thereby limiting the inaccuracy of the method.Preferably, calculating the speed V of the air comprises the stages of: calculating the Nyquist speeds Vn1, Vn2, Vn3 corresponding to each rate F1, F2, F3 and calculating the equivalent Nyquist speed Vneq; for each value of an integer k varying over the range [−Vneq/2Vn1+½; Vneq/2Vn1+½)]: calculating a speed Vtest=V1+2 kVn1; folding the speed Vtest into the ranges [−Vn2, Vn2] and [−Vn3, Vn3] to obtain the speeds V2′ and V3′; and calculating the differences ΔV2=V2′−V2 and ΔV3=V3′−V3 and the root-mean-square deviation E=√((ΔV22+ΔV32)/2); and retaining as the speed V, the speed Vtest corresponding to the smallest root-mean-square deviation. This mode of calculation is found to be relatively reliable and simple to implement by computer while using computer resources that are relatively small.Advantageously, the rates F1, F2, F3 are relatively close.This leads to the radar transmitter being stressed relatively little and therefore limits wear thereof.In a particular implementation, the method includes a step of determining said rates F1, F2, F3 by performing the following stages: determining pairs p/q and r/s such that p and q and also r and s are mutually prime, q and s are greater than p and r, respectively, p is greater than q/2, and r is greater than s/2; selecting a rate F1 and calculating a corresponding Nyquist speed Vn1; selecting a speed V′ corresponding to the maximum speed of air in the measurement zone and folding the speed V′ into the range [−Vn1, Vn1] to obtain the speed V1′; for each pair p/q and r/s: calculating rates F2=F1×p/q and F3=F1×r/s and calculating the Nyquist speeds Vn2 and Vn3; calculating the equivalent Nyquist speed Vneq=1 cm(p,r)×Vn1; for each value of an integer k varying over the range [−Vneq/2Vn1+½; Vneq/2Vn1+½] calculating a speed Vtest=V1′+2 kVn1; folding the speed Vtest into the ranges [−Vn2, Vn2] and [−Vn3, Vn3] to obtain the speeds V2′ and V3′; calculating the differences ΔV2=V2′−V2 and ΔV3=V3−V3 and calculating the root-mean-square deviation E=√((ΔV22+ΔV32)/2); and retaining the speed Vtest that corresponds to the smallest root-mean-square deviation; and comparing the speeds Vtest obtained for all of the pairs with the speed V′ to select the best pair. This determination technique is relatively simple, reliable, and fast.The comparison then advantageously comprises the stages of calculating, for all of the pairs, the difference Δ′=Vtest−V′ and verifying whether A′ is less than half the Nyquist speed Vn1.This comparison technique combines simplicity and effectiveness.Also preferably, the method includes the stage of allocating noise to the speeds V1′, V2′, and V3′ prior to using them in the calculations, the noise corresponding to the noise specific to the radar and to the atmospheric conditions that are usual in the measurement zone, and the step of folding the speeds V1′, V2′, and V3′ made noisy in this way into the ranges [−Vn1, Vn1], [−Vn2, Vn2], and [−Vn3, Vn3] to obtain the speeds V1′, V2′, and V3′ used subsequently in the calculations.It is thus possible to determine repetition rates that are optimized for the zone of the atmosphere in which speed measurements are performed.Other characteristics and advantages of the invention appear on reading the following description of a particular, non-limiting implementation of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Reference is made to the accompanying drawings, in which:FIG. 1 is a flow chart showing the general sequence of the method of the invention;FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing the sequence of the step of determining frequencies in accordance with the invention; and FIG. 3 is a diagram showing pulse transmission over time.

Reference is made to the accompanying drawings, in which:FIG. 1 is a flow chart showing the general sequence of the method of the invention;FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing the sequence of the step of determining frequencies in accordance with the invention; and FIG. 3 is a diagram showing pulse transmission over time.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

With reference to the figures, the method in accordance with the invention is implemented by means of a Doppler radar suitable for transmitting bursts of pulses with the repetition rate changing between each pulse.

To measure the speed of air, the method of the invention begins with step 30 of transmitting bursts of three pulses 1, 2, 3 at different rates F1, F2, F3 (the duration t1 between the pulses 1 and 2 is different from the duration t2 between the pulses 2 and 3, and the duration t3 between the pulse 3 of one burst and the pulse 1 of the following burst is likewise different from the durations t1 and t2, see FIG. 3).When a pulse encounters particles in suspension in the air, the particles reflect a pulse back to the radar.The method thus continues with a step 40 of determining speeds V1, V2, V3 of the air on the basis of the pulses received in return from the pulses 1, 2, and 3 in each burst. The way in which the speeds V1, V2, V3 are calculated is itself known and relies on the following formula:

V=Fd×λ/2

where Fd is the frequency shift of the received pulse compared with the transmitted pulse (also known as the Doppler frequency).

The speed V of the air is then calculated from the speeds V1, V2, V3 determined for the pulses received in return from each burst (step 50).

Calculating the speed V of the air requires the Nyquist speeds Vn1, Vn2, Vn3 to have been calculated corresponding to each repetition rate F1, F2, F3, and also requires the equivalent Nyquist speed Vneq to have been calculated (step 20). It is recalled that the Nyquist speed is equal to the product of the wavelength of the pulse multiplied by the repetition rate divided by 4. By way of example:

Vn1=λ×F1/4

The equivalent Nyquist speed Vneq is calculated from the ratio of the rate relating to the rate F1 and the Nyquist speed Vn1 as explained below in the description of the step of determining rates.

Thereafter, an integer number k is caused to vary over the range [−Vneq/2 Vn1+½; Vneq/2Vn1+½] and for each value of k in the range: a speed Vtest=V1+2 kVn1 is calculated; the speed Vtest is folded into the ranges [−Vn2, Vn2] and [−Vn3, Vn3] to obtain speeds V21 and V3′. V21=Vtest modulo (2Vn2) and V3′=Vtest modulo (2Vn3); and the differences ΔV2=V2′−V2 and ΔV3=V3′−V3, and the root-mean-square deviation

E=√((ΔV22+ΔV32)/2)

are calculated.

Then the root-mean-square deviations obtained for all of the values of k are compared with one another and the speed Vtest corresponding to the smallest root-mean-square deviation is retained as being the speed V of the air (step 60).

To enable the method of the invention to be implemented, it is necessary previously to have determined the pulse repetition rates F1, F2, and F3. Step 10 of determining the rates F1, F2, and F3 is shown in detail in FIG. 2 and begins with a stage 11 of determining pairs of parameter ratios p/q and r/s that are used for defining the rates F2 and F3 as a function of F1:

F2=F1×p/q and F3=F1×r/s

Preferably, in order to optimize the search for these pairs, constraints are imposed in selecting the para-meters p, q, r, and s: p and q and also r and s are mutually prime; q and s are greater than p and r, respectively; p/q is greater than r/s; p is greater than q/2; and r is greater than s/2. The parameters p and r are advantageously greater than q/2 and s/2 respectively, to ensure that the rates F2 and F3 are not much less than the rate F1, since if they were that would run the risk of causing wear in the magnetron of the radar.

In practice, in order to restrict the number of possibilities, the value of p can be limited to 11.In addition, it has been found that for maximum effectiveness of the method, the parameter q is preferably equal to p+1.

The step of determining pulse repetition rates is continued by a stage 12 during which the first repetition rate F1 is selected as a function of technical characteristics of the radar and of the corresponding calculated Nyquist speed Vn1. A speed V′ corresponding to the maximum speed of air in the measurement zone is folded into the Nyquist range [−Vn1, Vn1] to obtain the speed V1′, i.e. V1′=V′ modulo (2×Vn1). During stage 13, noise corresponding to the noise specific to the radar and to the usual atmospheric conditions in the measurement zone is allocated to the speed V1′, and the speed V1′ made noisy in this way is folded as before into the range [−Vn1, Vn1] to obtain the speed V1′ that is used subsequently in the calculations. The noise added to the speed V1′ is noise with Gaussian distribution, zero mean, and a standard deviation that can be parameterized in such a manner that the noise corresponds to the noise encountered under conditions of use.

The following operations are then performed for each pair p/q and r/s (stage 14): calculating the rates F2=F1×p/q and F3=F1×r/s and the corresponding Nyquist speeds Vn2, Vn3; calculating the equivalent Nyquist speed Vneq by multiplying the Nyquist speed Vn1 by the least common multiple of the parameters p and r (Vneq=1 cm (p,r)×Vn1) for each value of integer k varying in the range [[−Vneq/2Vn1+½; Vneq/2Vn1+½]; calculating a speed Vtest=V1′+2 kVn1; folding the speed Vtest into the ranges [−Vn2, Vn2] and [−Vn3, Vn3] to obtain the speeds V2′ and V3′; as for the speed V1′, allocating noise to the speeds V2′ and V3′, which noise corresponds to the noise specific to the radar and to the usual atmospheric conditions in the measurement zone, and folding the speeds V2′ and V3′ made noisy in this way into the ranges [−Vn2, Vn2] and [−Vn3, Vn3] to obtain the speeds V2′ and V3′ used subsequently in the calculations; and calculating the differences ΔV2=V2′−V2 and ΔV3=V3′−V3 and the root-mean-square deviation E=√((ΔV22+ΔV32)/2) retaining the speed Vtest that corresponds to the smallest root-mean-square deviation. The step of determining the pulse repetition rates terminates by comparing (15) the speeds Vtest obtained for all of the pairs with the speed V′ in order to select the best pair. This comparison comprises stages of calculating for all of the pairs the difference Δ′=Vtest−V′, comparing the differences Δ′, and verifying whether Δ′ is less than half the Nyquist speed Vn1. In order to refine the selection of the best pair, it is also possible to compare the root-mean-square deviation obtained by looking for the pair presenting the difference Δ′ and the root-mean-square deviation E that are the smallest, or the pair giving the best compromise between these two quantities.

By way of example, given the atmospheric conditions in France, and more particularly air turbulence in this country, the following parameters give satisfactory results: p=6, q=7, r=4, s=5, or p=7, q=8, r=2, and s=3.

Thus, by selecting a rate F1 at 375 Hz, using the first of the parameters, the following values are obtained F2=321 Hz and F3=300 Hz.These parameters can naturally be used for any zone presenting conditions similar to those encountered in France.Naturally, the invention is not limited to the implementation described, and variant implementations can be devised without going beyond the ambit of the invention as defined by the claims.The method of determining frequencies can be implemented for several different levels of noise so as to evaluate the pertinence of the pairs retained compared with the levels of noise encountered.The numerical values are given purely by way of indication, and other values could naturally be used. link....

With reference to the figures, the method in accordance with the invention is implemented by means of a Doppler radar suitable for transmitting bursts of pulses with the repetition rate changing between each pulse.

To measure the speed of air, the method of the invention begins with step 30 of transmitting bursts of three pulses 1, 2, 3 at different rates F1, F2, F3 (the duration t1 between the pulses 1 and 2 is different from the duration t2 between the pulses 2 and 3, and the duration t3 between the pulse 3 of one burst and the pulse 1 of the following burst is likewise different from the durations t1 and t2, see FIG. 3).When a pulse encounters particles in suspension in the air, the particles reflect a pulse back to the radar.The method thus continues with a step 40 of determining speeds V1, V2, V3 of the air on the basis of the pulses received in return from the pulses 1, 2, and 3 in each burst. The way in which the speeds V1, V2, V3 are calculated is itself known and relies on the following formula:

V=Fd×λ/2

where Fd is the frequency shift of the received pulse compared with the transmitted pulse (also known as the Doppler frequency).

The speed V of the air is then calculated from the speeds V1, V2, V3 determined for the pulses received in return from each burst (step 50).

Calculating the speed V of the air requires the Nyquist speeds Vn1, Vn2, Vn3 to have been calculated corresponding to each repetition rate F1, F2, F3, and also requires the equivalent Nyquist speed Vneq to have been calculated (step 20). It is recalled that the Nyquist speed is equal to the product of the wavelength of the pulse multiplied by the repetition rate divided by 4. By way of example:

Vn1=λ×F1/4

The equivalent Nyquist speed Vneq is calculated from the ratio of the rate relating to the rate F1 and the Nyquist speed Vn1 as explained below in the description of the step of determining rates.

Thereafter, an integer number k is caused to vary over the range [−Vneq/2 Vn1+½; Vneq/2Vn1+½] and for each value of k in the range: a speed Vtest=V1+2 kVn1 is calculated; the speed Vtest is folded into the ranges [−Vn2, Vn2] and [−Vn3, Vn3] to obtain speeds V21 and V3′. V21=Vtest modulo (2Vn2) and V3′=Vtest modulo (2Vn3); and the differences ΔV2=V2′−V2 and ΔV3=V3′−V3, and the root-mean-square deviation

E=√((ΔV22+ΔV32)/2)

are calculated.

Then the root-mean-square deviations obtained for all of the values of k are compared with one another and the speed Vtest corresponding to the smallest root-mean-square deviation is retained as being the speed V of the air (step 60).

To enable the method of the invention to be implemented, it is necessary previously to have determined the pulse repetition rates F1, F2, and F3. Step 10 of determining the rates F1, F2, and F3 is shown in detail in FIG. 2 and begins with a stage 11 of determining pairs of parameter ratios p/q and r/s that are used for defining the rates F2 and F3 as a function of F1:

F2=F1×p/q and F3=F1×r/s

Preferably, in order to optimize the search for these pairs, constraints are imposed in selecting the para-meters p, q, r, and s: p and q and also r and s are mutually prime; q and s are greater than p and r, respectively; p/q is greater than r/s; p is greater than q/2; and r is greater than s/2. The parameters p and r are advantageously greater than q/2 and s/2 respectively, to ensure that the rates F2 and F3 are not much less than the rate F1, since if they were that would run the risk of causing wear in the magnetron of the radar.

In practice, in order to restrict the number of possibilities, the value of p can be limited to 11.In addition, it has been found that for maximum effectiveness of the method, the parameter q is preferably equal to p+1.

The step of determining pulse repetition rates is continued by a stage 12 during which the first repetition rate F1 is selected as a function of technical characteristics of the radar and of the corresponding calculated Nyquist speed Vn1. A speed V′ corresponding to the maximum speed of air in the measurement zone is folded into the Nyquist range [−Vn1, Vn1] to obtain the speed V1′, i.e. V1′=V′ modulo (2×Vn1). During stage 13, noise corresponding to the noise specific to the radar and to the usual atmospheric conditions in the measurement zone is allocated to the speed V1′, and the speed V1′ made noisy in this way is folded as before into the range [−Vn1, Vn1] to obtain the speed V1′ that is used subsequently in the calculations. The noise added to the speed V1′ is noise with Gaussian distribution, zero mean, and a standard deviation that can be parameterized in such a manner that the noise corresponds to the noise encountered under conditions of use.

The following operations are then performed for each pair p/q and r/s (stage 14): calculating the rates F2=F1×p/q and F3=F1×r/s and the corresponding Nyquist speeds Vn2, Vn3; calculating the equivalent Nyquist speed Vneq by multiplying the Nyquist speed Vn1 by the least common multiple of the parameters p and r (Vneq=1 cm (p,r)×Vn1) for each value of integer k varying in the range [[−Vneq/2Vn1+½; Vneq/2Vn1+½]; calculating a speed Vtest=V1′+2 kVn1; folding the speed Vtest into the ranges [−Vn2, Vn2] and [−Vn3, Vn3] to obtain the speeds V2′ and V3′; as for the speed V1′, allocating noise to the speeds V2′ and V3′, which noise corresponds to the noise specific to the radar and to the usual atmospheric conditions in the measurement zone, and folding the speeds V2′ and V3′ made noisy in this way into the ranges [−Vn2, Vn2] and [−Vn3, Vn3] to obtain the speeds V2′ and V3′ used subsequently in the calculations; and calculating the differences ΔV2=V2′−V2 and ΔV3=V3′−V3 and the root-mean-square deviation E=√((ΔV22+ΔV32)/2) retaining the speed Vtest that corresponds to the smallest root-mean-square deviation. The step of determining the pulse repetition rates terminates by comparing (15) the speeds Vtest obtained for all of the pairs with the speed V′ in order to select the best pair. This comparison comprises stages of calculating for all of the pairs the difference Δ′=Vtest−V′, comparing the differences Δ′, and verifying whether Δ′ is less than half the Nyquist speed Vn1. In order to refine the selection of the best pair, it is also possible to compare the root-mean-square deviation obtained by looking for the pair presenting the difference Δ′ and the root-mean-square deviation E that are the smallest, or the pair giving the best compromise between these two quantities.

By way of example, given the atmospheric conditions in France, and more particularly air turbulence in this country, the following parameters give satisfactory results: p=6, q=7, r=4, s=5, or p=7, q=8, r=2, and s=3.

Thus, by selecting a rate F1 at 375 Hz, using the first of the parameters, the following values are obtained F2=321 Hz and F3=300 Hz.These parameters can naturally be used for any zone presenting conditions similar to those encountered in France.Naturally, the invention is not limited to the implementation described, and variant implementations can be devised without going beyond the ambit of the invention as defined by the claims.The method of determining frequencies can be implemented for several different levels of noise so as to evaluate the pertinence of the pairs retained compared with the levels of noise encountered.The numerical values are given purely by way of indication, and other values could naturally be used. link....

## No comments:

## Post a Comment